Letter to Senator Mike Crapo, (R-ID)

Dear Senator Crapo,
In your response, you state, that "only native-born U.S. citizens (or those born abroad, but only to parents who were both American citizens) may be President of the United States.
Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, of the U.S. Constitution requires the president to be a natural-born U.S. citizen, not a native-born U.S. citizen.

You also state, "some individual have filed lawsuits in state and federal courts alleging that he has not proven that he is an American citizen but each of those lawsuits have been dismissed."

Those lawsuits, Senator Crapo, were dismissed on procedural grounds, not on merit. As such, the dismissal of the cases does not prove that Barack Obama is an American citizen.

You also state, "Furthermore, both the Director of Hawaii's Department of Health and the state's Registrar of Vital Statistics recently confirmed that Mr. Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii on August 4, 1961 and, as such, meets the constitutional citizenship requirements for the presidency."

Follows is the exact wording of the press release of Dr Fukino, director of Hawaii's Department of Health, October 31, 2008

“There have been numerous requests for Sen. Barack Hussein Obama’s official birth certificate. State law (Hawai‘i Revised Statutes §338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record.

“Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.

“No state official, including Governor Linda Lingle, has ever instructed that this vital record be handled in a manner different from any other vital record in the possession of the State of Hawai‘i.”

There is nothing in that press release that states Obama was born in Honolulu. The Hawaii Act 96, in effect from 1911 until 1972, allowed for the birth registration of foreign born children in Hawaii. Until the long-form birth certificate is produced and examined, where Obama was actually born is unknown.

The Department of Health, State of Hawaii, has gone on record stating they cannot confirm the authenticity of the document that Barack Obama claims is his birth certificate but that is actually a certification of live birth. That COLB has appeared at various places on the web and has been determined to be altered/forged. To obtain the COLB from the state of Hawaii requires a written request. A request for disclosure of all documents under all the names by which Barack Obama is known, has produced no such written request for a COLB.

It is the duty of Congress not the Supreme Court to address this problem. Senators and Representatives were aware of the eligibility issue and had the evidence before them before they certified the electoral college on January 8, 2009. It is the sworn duty of every elected official in Washington, DC, to uphold the Constitution.

Sincerely,

One natural-born Unhappy American Taxpaying Citizen

Dictatorship. Bill H.J. Res. 5

Will the "Usurper" as dictator in the White House, ever have to show his true birth certificate like the one I have, you know with the hospital and the attending doctor, etc?

Some in the news media feel this natural-born American citizen issue has been resolved legally.... Below my answer to Idaho Senator Mike Crapo's letter of June 10, 2009:

Dear Senator Crapo,
In your response, you state, that "only native-born U.S. citizens (or those born abroad, but only to parents who were both American citizens) may be President of the United States.
Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, requires the president to be a natural-born U.S. citizen, not a native-born U.S. citizen.

You also state, "some individual have filed lawsuits in state and federal courts alleging that he has not proven that he is an American citizen but each of those lawsuits have been dismissed."

Those lawsuits, Senator Crapo, were dismissed on procedural grounds, not on merit. As such, the dismissal of the cases does not prove that Barack Obama is an American citizen.

You also state, "Furthermore, both the Director of Hawaii's Department of Health and the state's Registrar of Vital Statistics recently confirmed that Mr. Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii on August 4, 1961 and, as such, meets the constitutional citizenship requirements for the presidency."

Follows is the exact wording of the press release of Dr Fukino, director of Hawaii's Department of Health, October 31, 2008

“There have been numerous requests for Sen. Barack Hussein Obama’s official birth certificate. State law (Hawai‘i Revised Statutes §338-18) prohibits the release of a certified birth certificate to persons who do not have a tangible interest in the vital record.

“Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai‘i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai‘i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.

“No state official, including Governor Linda Lingle, has ever instructed that this vital record be handled in a manner different from any other vital record in the possession of the State of Hawai‘i.”

There is nothing in that press release that states Obama was born in Honolulu. The Hawaii Act 96, in effect from 1911 until 1972, allowed for the birth registration of foreign born children in Hawaii. Until the long-form birth certificate is produced and examined, where Obama was actually born is unknown.

The Department of Health, State of Hawaii, has gone on record stating they cannot confirm the authenticity of the document that Barack Obama claims is his birth certificate but that is actually a certification of live birth. That COLB has appeared at various places on the web and has been determined to be altered/forged. To obtain the COLB from the state of Hawaii requires a written request. A request for disclosure of all documents under all the names by which Barack Obama is known, has produced no such written request for a COLB.

It is the duty of Congress not the Supreme Court to address this problem. Senators and Representatives were aware of the eligibility issue and had the evidence before them before they certified the electoral college on January 8, 2009. It is the sworn duty of every elected official in Washington, DC, to uphold the Constitution.

Sincerely,

One Unhappy American

A Fair Assessment of the USA

This lady has it right ...This gal about covers it all! -----

Letter of Outrage -----This letter was sent to the Wall Street Journal on August 8, 2008 byAlisa Wilson, Ph.D. Of Beverly Hills , CA . in response to the WallStreet Journal article titled

"Where's The Outrage?" that appearedJuly31,2008.

Really. I can tell you where the outrage is. The outrage is here, in this middle-aged, well-educated, upper-middle class woman. The outrageis here, but I have no representation, no voice.

The outrage is here, but no one is listening for who am I? I am not a billionaire like George Soros that can fund an entirepolitical movement. I am not a celebrity like Barbra Streisand that can garner the attention of the press to promote political candidates. I am not a film maker like Michael Moore or Al Gore that can delivermisleading movies to the public.

The outrage is here, but unlike those with money or power, I don'tknow how to reach those who feel similarly in order to effect change.Why am I outraged? I am outraged that my country, the United States ofAmerica , is in a state of moral and ethical decline. There is no right or wrong anymore, just what's fair.

Is it fair that millions of Americans who overreached and borrowedmore than they could afford are now being bailed out by the governmentand lending institutions to stave off foreclosure? Why shouldn't thesepeople be made to pay the consequences for their poor judgment?

When my husband and I purchased our home, we were careful to purchaseonly what we could afford. Believe me, there are much larger, muchnicer homes that I would have loved to have purchased. But, takingresponsibility for my behavior and my life, I went with the house thatwe could afford, not the house that we could not afford. The notion ofpersonal responsibility has all but died in our country.

I am outraged, that the country that welcomed my mother as an immigrant from Hitler's Nazi Germany and required that she and herfamily learn English now allows itself to be overrun with illegal immigrants and worse, caters to those illegal immigrants.

I am outraged that my hard-earned taxes help support those here illegally. That the Los Angeles Public School District is in such disarray that I felt it incumbent to send my child to private school, that every time I go to the ATM, I see "do you want to continue inEnglish or Spanish?", that every time I call the bank, the phone company , or similar business, I hear "press 1 for English or press 2 for Spanish". WHY? This is America , our common language is English and attempts to promote a bi- or multi-lingual society are sure to fail and to marginalize those who cannot communicate in English.

I am outraged at our country's weakness in the face of new threats onAmerican traditions from Muslims. Just this week, Tyson's Food negotiated with its union to permit Muslims to have Eid-al-Fitr as a holiday instead of Labor Day. What am I missing? Yes, there is a large Somali Muslim population working at the Tyson's plant in Tennessee. Tennessee , last I checked, is still part of the United States . If Muslims want to live and work here they should be required to live andwork by our American Laws and not impose their will on our long history.

In the same week, Random House announced that they had indefinitely delayed the publication of The Jewel of Medina, by Sherry Jones, a book about the life of Mohammed's wife, Aisha due to fear of retribution and violence by Muslims. When did we become a nation ruled by fear of what other immigrant groups want? It makes me so sad to see large corporations cave rather than stand proudly on the principles that built this country.

I am outraged because appeasement has never worked as a political policy, yet appeasing Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is exactly what we are trying to do. An excellent article, also published recently in theWall Street Journal, went through over 20 years of history and why talking with Iran has been and will continue to be ineffective. Yet talk, with a madman no less, we continue to do. Have we so lost our moral compass and its ability to detect evil that we will not go in and destroy Iran's nuclear program? Would we rather wait for anotherHolocaust for the Jews - one which they would be unlikely to survive? When does it end?

As if the battle for good and evil isn't enough, now come theEnvironmentalists who are so afraid of global warming that they wantto put a Bag tax on grocery bags in California; to eliminate Mylar balloons; to establish something as insidious as the recycle police in San Francisco. I do my share for the environment: I recycle, I use water wisely, I installed an energy efficient air conditioning unit. But when and where does the lunacy stop? Ahmadinejad wants to wipe Israel off the map, the California economy is being overrun by illegal immigrants, and the United States of America no longer knows right from wrong, good from evil.. So what does California do?
Tax grocerybags.

So, America , although I can tell you where the outrage is, this one middle-aged, well-educated, upper middle class woman is powerless to do anything about it. I don't even feel like my vote counts because I am so outnumbered by those who disagree with me.

Alisa Wilson, Ph.D.
Beverly Hills , California

Comment: Great job Ms. Wilson. I think many agree with, especially those of us who marched April 15, 2009..... If natural-born American taxpaying citizens do-not follow through and remove this "Usurper" from the oval office immediately, if not sooner this former Republic will be in the third world tank with no way out!
Thanks again:
Unhappy American

Readers View

Shown below is my view of the current situation of the interlocking of government and corporations and the end result they are proposing. Although, you may not agree I believe if you took the time you too would reach a similar conclusion. The evidence is clearly in view, and stated quite lucidly by former government officials. I would welcome comments from the public that may have different views, but it first must come to their view.

The story of America, when finally written, will be one of a people struggling to go from rags to riches, and of the few who rose to the top and destroyed the rest. All the rhetoric about a nation of opportunity is merely fiction for most. In order to rise to the highest levels one's ambition must be greater than the love for our fellow man or country. One has to abandon all ethics, morals, and commit to a secular god of greed and power.

Mega-corporations, led by intertwined individuals, define the rules how nations will act and the amount they must pay. These individuals control the aspiring novices and only allow the most dedicated to rise from the local level. As these youngsters are impregnated with the rules, and then show their loyalties to the cause, they may advance. Importantly they must be willing to embrace the very essence of "getting-ahead", i. e. complete obedience to economic growth regardless of consequence. It is the amount that one can bring to the coffers that matters, regardless of how achieved, or whether the result is detrimental to man or his environment. The end, acquiring and amassing wealth, justifies the means.Blindly our nation has turned over it's leadership to incompetents, or perhaps more accurately, willing partisans eager to gain both favor of their bosses and financial benefit. By these miscreants, and with help from the mighty nine Black Robes, Lincoln's words have been transformed into "of the corporation, by the corporation, and for the corporation." We the people have been cast aside and relieved of our Constitutional status.

These misanthropes find hate in Madison's words "That government is instituted and ought to be exercised for the benefit of the people." Now, they see the only purpose for the people, is to provide the wherewithal so that government can fulfill the needs of global corporations. Therefore, Congress writes the laws following the dictates of corporations. When satisfied the corporation will benefit, Congress meets to bestow their blessings. The Constitution is gladly abused, set-aside, or ignored by government if it does not conform to the wishes of those who stand to gain and have the power to control the outcome.

How do we know, by none other than that authority Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who explains "In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way."

Can we say that innocently, without malice, global corporations are victims of a world-wide crash of markets, lending institutions etc.? Here we are bailing out international banks, auto giants, and other world wide conglomerates, why?

The answer B. Hussein Obama has given you, via Joe the Plumber, "To redistribute the wealth." What he didn't tell Joe it was to continue the Bush doctrine of taking from the poorer and giving to the richer.

What easier way to institute the corporate elite plan of a new world order; destroy America by making us dependent on foreign nations.

As Henry Kissinger recently put it, when he was celebrating U.S.-China relations on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, Obama's mission is to usher in a "New World Order." He forgot to mention, of course, that it is a China-dominated New World Order in which the U.S. has become a subsidiary of China, Inc.," (www.newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff288.htm). If you doubt, investigate for yourself the interconnectedness of Obama's team, Geithner, Volcker, Summers et al., and their worldly views and whom they truly represent. And you think Obama will bring change and hope?

Are you confident that our federal and state governments have your interests at heart?

Robert B. Murray II, Ph.D.

Additional Blog: www.all-about-illegal-immigration.blogspot.com

A YOUNG American makes A Modest Proposal:

Dear American liberals, leftists, social progressives, socialists, Marxists, Obama supporters, et al:
We have stuck together since the late 1950s, but the whole of this latest election process has made me realize that I want a divorce. I know we tolerated each other for many years for the sake of future generations, but sadly, this relationship has run its course.

Our two ideological sides of America cannot, and will not ever agree on what is right, so let's just end it on friendly terms. We can smile, chalk it up to irreconcilable differences, and go our own way. & lt; /DIV>

Here is a model dissolution agreement: Our two groups can equitably divide up the country by landmass each taking a portion. That will be the difficult part, but I am sure our two sides can come to a friendly agreement. After that it should be relatively easy!

Our respective representatives can effortlessly divide other assets since both sides have such distinct and disparate tastes. We don't like redistributive taxes so you can keep them. You are welcome to the liberal judges and the ACLU. Since you hate guns and war, we'll take our firearms, the cops, the NRA, and the military. You can keep Oprah, Michael Moore, and Rosie O'Donnell (You are, however , responsible for finding a bio-diesel vehicle big enough to move them).

We'll keep the capitalism, greedy corporations, pharmaceutical companies, Wal-Mart, and Wall Street. You can have your beloved homeless, homeboys, hippies, and illegal aliens. We'll keep the hot Alaskan hockey moms, greedy CEOs, and rednecks. We'll keep the bibles and give you NBC and Hollywood . You can make nice with Iran and Palestine and we'll retain the right to invade and hammer places that threaten us.

You can have the peaceniks and war protestors. When our allies or way of life are under assault, we'll provide them job security. We'll keep our Judeo-Christian values...You are welcome to
Islam, Scientology, Humanism, and Shirley McClain. You can also have the U.N. But we will no longer be paying the bill. We'll keep the SUVs, pickup trucks, and over-sized luxury cars. You can take every Subaru station wagon you can find. You can give everyone healthcare, if you can find any practicing doctors. bsp; We'll continue to believe healthcare is a luxury and not a right.
We'll keep The Battle Hymn of the Republic and the National Anthem. I'm sure you'll be happy to substitute Imagine, I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing, Kum Ba Ya, or We Are the World.

We'll practice trickle-down economics, and you can give trickle-up poverty its best shot.
Since it often so offends you we'll keep our history, our name, and our flag and our GOD and prayer.

Would you agree to this? If so please pass it along to other like minded patriots, and if you do not agree, just hit delete and hang on. In the spirit of friendly parting, I'll bet you ANWAR on who will need whose help in 15 years.

Sincerely,

John J. Wall.
law student and an American

P.S. Also, please take Barbra Streisand and Jane Fonda

Dear Ms. Starrett: Constitution Party

You wrote: "We fight back every time we write a letter to an elected official a letter to the editor or send a donation to an organization that fights for the issues close to our hearts. We fight back each time we dare run for office against the incumbents. In addition, we fight back with each prayer we utter invoking Divine Providence." All very important concepts, but how effective?

1. I write my elected officials frequently, and get back a form letter on a subject I did not write about. If on subject, it fails to address my concern, or just merely tells me how much he/she is concerned. At votetime he/she has expressed another view.

2. I cannot even get organizations that I support to respond to questions I have. There is never any real plan brought forth by most organizations to solve the problem that they are engaged to fight. We write, write, and write some more, but to each other. I voted for the Constitutional Party in the general election, but wonder why there were so few votes for Baldwin?
Where was the message? Even the local chapter was largely benign.

3. I do vote against incumbents generally, but the alternatives are not desirable in most cases. That's a dilemma that the local chapter needs to address, being more effective in making their case for or against someone.

4. God, does have a plan, and perhaps we have abused or rejected his desire for fulfillment? I am no longer sure this nation is "one underGod." We have allowed God fearing people to be rejected in favor of agnosticism and atheism, through the huge influx of diversity. Everyone, regardless of consequence, now control some portion of our lives. Democracy has totally replaced Republicanism.

Obama, now considered by the masses as the messiah, is false hope, and the change he offers is from freedom and liberty to socialism/communism. Our system of government has crashed and is totally under the control of large corporations and their one world governmental dream.
We cannot even get the U.S. Supreme Court to address one simple question...
what is a natural born citizen?

Answer, that Chief Justice Roberts and B. Hussein Obama is no longer eligible.

Thank you for letting me vent my anger.

Robert B. Murray II, Ph.D.

Dr. Murray,
While it appears we're not making any strides, at least we're holding them off to some degree.

We're called to show up for duty and leave the results to God.

There's a saying that goes something like.." I can't do everything, but I can do something, and what I can do, I must do!"

That always helps me when I feel overwhelmed.

Thanks for your email!

Sincerely,

Mary Starrett
Constitution Party

A Brit speaks the truth about our elections.

Voting in the U.S. Election is a COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME... Politics / US Politics
Nov 02, 2008 - 02:05 PM
By: Clive_Maund

The United States likes to portray itself as the bastion of freedom and champion of democracy, but if this were really true then there would be at least 6 or 8 different parties to choose from at election time, and given that it is now a country of over 300 million people a choice of at least 10 different parties would be more appropriate, but instead there are just two.

Why is this?

The reason comes down to the "concentration of power" issue that we addressed in an earlier article with respect to corporate America and the systematic disenfranchisement of its population.

The reality is that the two remaining political parties, the Democratic and Republican parties are in fact one, and the only reason that the ultimate step is never taken and the parties merged is that with one party to vote for and an election being completely superfluous, even Joe Sixpack would realize that he is living in a dictatership.
So the 2 remaining parties continue to dumbbell around each other for ever, maintaining the thinnest facade of democracy, and controlling the country for their elitist masters via their duopoly of power.

The plutocratic elites who control the United States and both the Democratic and Republican parties also have complete control over the media, whose job it is to maintain the illusion of democracy, especially during the farcical circus of the election campaign. They do this by playing up contrived and trivial differences between the parties and by playing up personalities who the voting public can identify with, a recent example of this crude but effective approach being the Alaskan hockey mom Sarah Palin suddenly being thrust forward into the limelight, and intended to provide a counterpoint to the sagging old man who would be President, John McCain. At a time of life when he should be content to sit in a rocking chair on his front porch, and dead head the roses and perhaps give occasional advice to troubled young people, McCain intends to try to run a country of 300 million people.

He looks like one long haul flight would finish him off. Although Obama would seem to be the better choice for President, on account of his youthful energy, generally positive dynamic attitude and eloquent use of English, the sad fact is that he is in the pockets of his plutocratic masters just as McCain is and must end up doing their bidding - if he wasn't his funding would have dried up and he would have been run into a ditch long ago.

So with both parties and both candidates completely compromised and representing the same vested interests, it is clear that voting will accomplish absolutely nothing and change nothing - it is a complete and utter waste of time.

The entire election campaign is a charade whose real purpose is to continue the elites' stranglehold on power, whilst at the same time maintaining the illusion that the US is a free and fair society, but otherwise it is a total waste of time and energy.

The lack of any substantive difference between the parties is worth making clear at this juncture, because it means that it is largely irrelevant to the markets who wins the election, and it is the purpose of this article to point this out.

It is always good to end an essentially gloomy article on a positive note. Whoever wins the election and becomes the next President has got to be an improvement on the crass and imbecilic George W Bush, who only got the job through extreme corruption and graft.

If nothing else, election day does provide a chance to socialize and may even present the opportunity for single readers to find a partner. The following chat up lines are tentatively suggested...

Male voter in line to female voter: "You do realize this is a complete waste of time don't you? - we won't change anything..."
Female voter: "Well, yes, but what the heck..."
Male voter: "Might I suggest that we go back to my place and try something a lot more meaningful"...

Feedback would be welcome from readers who try this chat up line whilst at the polling station, even - and especially - if you end up getting kicked shins and/or a black eye. As long-time readers know I am always ready to adjust my thinking...

By Clive Maund
CliveMaund.com

© 2008 Clive Maund - The above represents the opinion and analysis of Mr. Maund, based on data available to him, at the time of writing. Mr. Maunds opinions are his own, and are not a recommendation or an offer to buy or sell securities. No responsibility can be accepted for losses that may result as a consequence of trading on the basis of this analysis. Mr. Maund is an independent analyst who receives no compensation of any kind from any groups, individuals or corporations mentioned in his reports. As trading and investing in any financial markets may involve serious risk of loss, Mr. Maund recommends that you consult with a qualified investment advisor, one licensed by appropriate regulatory agencies in your legal jurisdiction and do your own due diligence and research when making any kind of a transaction with financial ramifications. Clive Maund Archive