Is the News Media mostly Propaganda?
The news media in general, with their liberal views connected to Socialist ideas leading toward Communist methods does not disgust me anymore, it just makes me damn angry.
What motivates the press and the Idaho Statesman to fill their papers with propaganda? A recent article by John Leland (Stolen Social Security numbers pave way for illegal immigrants) is a case in point.
The Statesman changed the original title and altered the content. The original published by the New York Times was titled "Some ID Theft IS Not for Profit, but to Get a Job."
Throughout both articles the thrust was to show that illegal aliens were not criminals, because by some fuzzy logic, it was justifiable for aliens to use fraudulent documents in order to be employed and even those affected by the crime sympathized with the alien.
The Leland article started with Camber Lybbert whose three year old daughter's Social Security number was being used by an illegal alien. This three year old had already incurred $25,000 in debt for two credit cards and two auto loans. We were informed that the father understood the illegal was just using the number to get a job, a car, and provide for his family. No serious crime was committed.
The Statesman chose to lead off with Maria, age 51 and an illegal alien, of Caldwell, Idaho who admittedly purchased a green card and Social Security card for $180 and complained she would not get her Social Security money when she retired. Scott, in Ogden, whose daughter had her number stolen by a female illegal in Provo, remarked "...give her Bailey's number and issue us a new one."
Are we to believe these are real or just contrived cases to convince us that fraud is not bad when it is for committed a good cause?
How did Mr. Leland find these individuals to obtain their stories? If you know the individual is an illegal alien and has committed a crime are you not also in violation of law if you do not report them?
Various subsections (Harboring, Encouraging/Inducing, Conspiracy/Aiding and Abetting) of Title 8 Section 1324 of U.S. Code makes the actions of those knowledgeable subject to penalties.
The alien has committed a crime when he ENTERS or ATTEMPTS TO ENTER the U.S. at any time or place other than designated. Aliens caught while attempting to enter can be fined. Here is the biggie...it is a felony offense (Title 18, Subsection 1546(b) to use false identification for the purposes of satisfying the employment verification provisions of Title 8 Subsection 1324a(b).
Not only have these illegal aliens committed crimes by entering, and avoiding inspection, many if not most have used fraudulent documents to secure jobs and benefits they are not entitled. A large number have re-entered after deportation one or more times. Therefore each and every one is a felon by definition of law.
Example: Elvira Arellano, 31-year old felon holed up in a store front United Methodist Church in Chicago, Illinois for 26 days? Why? She was deported, she returned, was caught?
Now it is reported, she has become pregnant, by they think the Church Pastor, "Slim."
Under Title 18, a person having been removed for commission of three or more misdemeanors involving drugs, crimes against persons, or both or a FELONY (other than an aggravated felony) the statutory maximum term of imprisonment is 10 years. Why are these individuals reported by Mr. Leland not in jail? Bush keeps saying, "We are a nation of laws?"
It is extremely frustrating knowing that newspapers, television, and radio broadcasters never tell the whole story. Almost every story is slanted to benefit the criminal.
I am angry that few of the politicians in this state even care about the future of this country as long as they get re-elected and benefit from the vast amounts of money exchanging hands.
Unhappy American
Blog Spot: http://allaboutillegalimmigration.blogspot.com
What motivates the press and the Idaho Statesman to fill their papers with propaganda? A recent article by John Leland (Stolen Social Security numbers pave way for illegal immigrants) is a case in point.
The Statesman changed the original title and altered the content. The original published by the New York Times was titled "Some ID Theft IS Not for Profit, but to Get a Job."
Throughout both articles the thrust was to show that illegal aliens were not criminals, because by some fuzzy logic, it was justifiable for aliens to use fraudulent documents in order to be employed and even those affected by the crime sympathized with the alien.
The Leland article started with Camber Lybbert whose three year old daughter's Social Security number was being used by an illegal alien. This three year old had already incurred $25,000 in debt for two credit cards and two auto loans. We were informed that the father understood the illegal was just using the number to get a job, a car, and provide for his family. No serious crime was committed.
The Statesman chose to lead off with Maria, age 51 and an illegal alien, of Caldwell, Idaho who admittedly purchased a green card and Social Security card for $180 and complained she would not get her Social Security money when she retired. Scott, in Ogden, whose daughter had her number stolen by a female illegal in Provo, remarked "...give her Bailey's number and issue us a new one."
Are we to believe these are real or just contrived cases to convince us that fraud is not bad when it is for committed a good cause?
How did Mr. Leland find these individuals to obtain their stories? If you know the individual is an illegal alien and has committed a crime are you not also in violation of law if you do not report them?
Various subsections (Harboring, Encouraging/Inducing, Conspiracy/Aiding and Abetting) of Title 8 Section 1324 of U.S. Code makes the actions of those knowledgeable subject to penalties.
The alien has committed a crime when he ENTERS or ATTEMPTS TO ENTER the U.S. at any time or place other than designated. Aliens caught while attempting to enter can be fined. Here is the biggie...it is a felony offense (Title 18, Subsection 1546(b) to use false identification for the purposes of satisfying the employment verification provisions of Title 8 Subsection 1324a(b).
Not only have these illegal aliens committed crimes by entering, and avoiding inspection, many if not most have used fraudulent documents to secure jobs and benefits they are not entitled. A large number have re-entered after deportation one or more times. Therefore each and every one is a felon by definition of law.
Example: Elvira Arellano, 31-year old felon holed up in a store front United Methodist Church in Chicago, Illinois for 26 days? Why? She was deported, she returned, was caught?
Now it is reported, she has become pregnant, by they think the Church Pastor, "Slim."
Under Title 18, a person having been removed for commission of three or more misdemeanors involving drugs, crimes against persons, or both or a FELONY (other than an aggravated felony) the statutory maximum term of imprisonment is 10 years. Why are these individuals reported by Mr. Leland not in jail? Bush keeps saying, "We are a nation of laws?"
It is extremely frustrating knowing that newspapers, television, and radio broadcasters never tell the whole story. Almost every story is slanted to benefit the criminal.
I am angry that few of the politicians in this state even care about the future of this country as long as they get re-elected and benefit from the vast amounts of money exchanging hands.
Unhappy American
Blog Spot: http://allaboutillegalimmigration.blogspot.com
posted by Unhappy American at
9:15 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home